Feasibility Study Process
Without a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of your real estate property and its surroundings, you won't even know where to begin effectively developing your real estate property. When obtaining the most information possible you'll be able to take the next steps to develop a project with its optimal potential.
Learn More
Developing a product that lacks demand, especially at the wrong time, could result in losing your and your partner's entire investment. By gaining clear insight into the supply pipeline and market demand, you'll be able to deliver products that are highly desirable, thereby maximizing your chances of success.
Learn More
3
Schematic Design
Without a financial plan, your project isn't likely to secure essential financing. With a real estate pro forma, you'll gain a comprehensive under-standing of the economic structure of your project, allowing you to articulate every detail, and attract the investors you need to make your project a success.
Learn More
Having no investment deck, you risk deterring potential investors and lenders from financing your project. A solid well-thought-out investment deck instills confidence in you and your partners, provides a thorough insight into your project, and increases the chances of attracting the capital you need.
Learn More
Schematic Design
When the Vision Is Unclear
Financial Assumptions Break Down
Without a clear representation of what can be built, development decisions are often based on incomplete or abstract assumptions. Unclear massing, unit counts, or building configuration can distort cost estimates, underwriting, and feasibility analysis.
Schematic design provides an early visual and dimensional framework that translates site and market insights into a defined development concept. This step supports more accurate financial modeling and informed decision-making before design, capital, or entitlement efforts advance.
The Risk of Proceeding Without a Vision
When projects advance without schematic design, key decisions rely on assumptions rather than a defined scope. As a result, size, density, layout, and constructability are often misjudged. Common consequences include:
-
Overestimating buildable area and overpaying for land
-
Misaligned expectations among partners and stakeholders
-
Inefficient design efforts caused by repeated restarts and revisions
-
Entering municipal discussions without a clear or defensible concept
-
Advancing financial models based on inaccurate or incomplete assumptions
Visual Clarity
Before Financial Commitment
Schematic design establishes a clear, testable development concept before financial, entitlement, or construction decisions advance. By defining massing, scale, unit counts, and basic configuration early, assumptions are replaced with a realistic framework that reflects site and market constraints. This clarity supports more accurate financial modeling, informed discussions with regulators, and alignment among owners, partners, and consultants. Rather than correcting scope late, when changes are costly, schematic design allows issues to be identified and addressed early, preserving flexibility and supporting disciplined decision-making.
Schematic Design in Context
Schematic design translates site and market insights into a defined development concept that can be evaluated and tested. By establishing building massing, layout, unit counts, and basic metrics early, this step provides the clarity required for realistic financial modeling and feasibility analysis. Visual representations, such as massing diagrams, floor plans, and preliminary metrics, allow assumptions to be examined before advancing to detailed site plans or construction documents. This clarity supports alignment among owners, partners, lenders, and regulatory bodies, and helps identify issues while adjustments are still manageable. Schematic design is not intended to finalize a project, but to define it sufficiently so decisions around scope, cost, approvals, and capital can be made with confidence rather than speculation.
Advancing Without a Defined Vision
Increases Risk
When schematic design is skipped or underdeveloped, projects advance without a defined scope. Assumptions about size, layout, unit counts, and constructability replace clarity. These gaps often surface after financial modeling or regulatory discussions begin, when changes are harder and more costly. In those cases, risk is embedded early through unclear scope.
Defining Vision & Scope Before Financial and Regulatory Decisions
Schematic design establishes a clear, testable development concept before financial, entitlement, or construction decisions advance. By translating site and market insights into a defined physical framework, this step allows assumptions to be evaluated against reality. At BLDG-UP, a schematic design is used as part of the broader feasibility review process to support accurate underwriting, productive regulatory discussions, and early stakeholder alignment. The objective is clarity, so projects move forward with a defined scope rather than unresolved assumptions.